“This is an old and primary tool of all oppressors to keep the oppressed occupied with the master's concerns.”
On September 29, 1979, Audre Lorde stood up at NYU's Institute for the Humanities and delivered an argument that has been echoing across universities, boardrooms, activist movements, and dinner tables ever since.
The occasion was a conference marking the thirtieth anniversary of the publication of Simone de Beauvoir's The Second Sex. The organizers assembled a panel with no Black women and no lesbians. Only late in the planning process did they recognize the omission and invite Lorde to participate.
Rather than thanking the organizers for finally finding room for her, she used the invitation to articulate the accumulated frustration of Black women, lesbians, working-class women, and others whose experiences had been treated as optional additions to feminist thought rather than central to it.
We didn't have intersections in those days, only curbs.
You don't get free by winning an argument inside a centuries-old structure designed to make sure you always lose it.
Lorde was talking about race, gender, power, and exclusion within feminism. She was talking about the wilful blindness of academia, too.
I'm not borrowing her conclusions but I'm borrowing one of her metaphors because, nearly fifty years later, it is still as relevant as ever.
Even if the context has shifted as it escaped the Ivory Tower and bestowed its withering scrutiny across the context of modern communications.
News came via Reuters on July 8th of this year that Meta was building a $13 billion 1-gigawatt data centre in central Alberta.


